The Eternal Flame

4

Carlo said, “I’d like to come back to your team, if you’ll have me. I’m giving up on wheat. I want to work with animals again.”

Tosco reached out for a guide rope and pulled himself away from his workbench. “What’s brought this on?” he asked. “I never thought of you as easily discouraged.”

Carlo tried to block out the anxious humming of the voles; there must have been three or four dozen of the animals in the cages attached to the far wall. It hadn’t taken him long to grow accustomed to the blissful silence of the plant kingdom.

He said, “Do you know what my biggest achievement in the last three years has been? Understanding why some farms end up with all of their wheat-flowers synchronized, while in others the plants split into two groups that take turns producing light.”

“I wouldn’t belittle that,” Tosco said. “Surely the yield is higher when there are staggered shifts?”

“It is,” Carlo replied. “Having half your neighbors sleeping means less ambient light to inhibit production. But the difference is tiny, it’s marginal. What I was really looking for was a way to keep the flowers open for a greater portion of each day—and nothing I tried brought me any closer to that. If I’m getting nowhere, maybe I should admit that I made a mistake by switching fields in the first place.”

Tosco stretched out his top pair of arms in a gesture encompassing the workshop. “So what exactly would you do, if you rejoined us?” One of Carlo’s old colleagues, Amanda, was dissecting a lizard on a bench nearby, with a huddle of students looking on. In the corner behind them another researcher, Macaria, who’d been loading a centrifuge with tissue samples, swung down the safety shield and retreated. Sometimes the different density fractions in organic matter weren’t stable on their own, and the endpoint could be explosive.

Carlo took a moment to summon up his courage; until now he hadn’t put this into words for anyone. “I want to find a way to inhibit quadraparity.”

“I see.” Tosco’s tone was not enthusiastic. “Do you know how many drugs they tested for that, before either of us were born? The only thing that kept the vole population stable in that program was the fact that the fatal treatments balanced the merely ineffectual ones.”

“So it might require something other than a drug,” Carlo ventured.

“We know how to inhibit quadraparity,” Tosco said. “The solution might not be as pleasant as we’d wish—”

“Or as reliable,” Carlo interjected.

“It’s not perfect,” Tosco conceded. “But no treatment is perfect. It’s an innate property of women’s bodies that they produce four offspring under ordinary conditions. Anything that interferes with such a fundamental process is doing damage to their health, by definition.”

“Holin isn’t perfect,” Carlo protested, “but where’s the damage or the pain from that?”

“Putting reproduction on hold isn’t the same as modifying the outcome.”

Carlo couldn’t argue with that, but he couldn’t accept the larger claim either. “Women’s bodies have an innate ability to be biparous, too. It makes sense that it’s normally only triggered by famine; the question is, triggered how? If we could understand that process in detail, why shouldn’t we be able to push the same lever without the usual antecedents?”

Tosco said, “Our bodies don’t come with levers attached. If you’re not going to throw random drugs at the problem, where would you start?”

Carlo hesitated, but there was no point underselling his plans now. “What I want to do is investigate the whole process of fission as thoroughly as possible. Unravel the mechanism in both biparous and quadraparous species—right down to the signaling level—then look for the safest, most effective point to intervene.”

Tosco buzzed wryly. “That’s a lofty proposal. Do you think it’s going to be easier than improving the crop yields?”

“Probably not,” Carlo admitted. “But to succeed at this would count for much more.”

“When you left here,” Tosco reminded him, “you told me you were going to double the wheat entitlements, then retire to raise your children.”

Carlo cringed. If he’d made some real progress toward that goal his youthful boast might have seemed less vain, but it would have done nothing to redeem his misdirected ambition. “And what would happen if someone actually achieved that?” he said. “We’d get a generation or two of plenty before the increased population overtook the increase in the harvest. What we need is stability. If I’ve read the history correctly, at the time of the launch so many women on the Peerless had escaped from coercive families and were committed to dying childless that it must have looked as if a balance could be maintained that way: for every woman who had four children, another would willingly have none at all. But that’s not the culture any more.”

“No.” Tosco regarded him with bemusement, but didn’t spell out what Carlo suspected he was thinking: The culture now is to accept the women’s famine. That works well enough, so why not let it be?

“Let me try this,” Carlo pleaded. If he had no other choice he could work on his own, but everything would be easier with the support of his former mentor and his team. “What’s the worst that can happen? We learn something useless about the reproductive cycle in voles?”

Tosco said, “The worst thing would be if the harvest fails, and you start wishing you’d persisted with your last career. But if you really believe you have the patience to carry this through—”

“I’m certain of that,” Carlo insisted.

Tosco looked skeptical, but he was done with arguing. He said, “How can I turn down an agronomist who’s willing to step off his pedestal and rejoin his old friends?”

It was Carlo’s turn to travel down the axis, to meet his co in the new home she’d made for herself. Most of his friends had told him that a partial separation sounded like the worst of both worlds, but he’d studied the numbers from the last census. Total separation was a bad idea: it left women at an elevated risk of spontaneous fission, and no amount of holin could eliminate that entirely. But living together and relying on willpower alone to delay reproduction was even worse; more than half the recorded births in those circumstances had come earlier than planned. The trick was to let your co’s body know that you hadn’t abandoned her—that if it waited, her children would be cared for—while doing all you could to minimize the risk of delivering on that promise prematurely.

Carla wasn’t home when he arrived at the apartment. The moss-light was enough for him to see his way around, so he didn’t light a lamp. He’d brought four loaves for them to share, for the evening meal and breakfast; he packed them away in the empty cupboard.

Passing the entrance to the bedroom, he saw a spare tarpaulin floating in the air, suspended against the weak gravity by a faint updraft from a cooling vent.

When he heard the guide rope twanging in the corridor he went to the doorway and parted the curtains. Carla saw him and chirped excitedly. “Get ready to hear some good news,” she said.

“What—you’ve won a place on the Gnat?”

“That would be something.” She followed him back into the apartment. “But this is better.”

Carlo lit a lamp in the front room, then clung to the rope beside her as she described her tarnishing experiment. She’d had to refresh his hazy memories of Nereo’s force and Yalda’s puzzles countless times before, so he knew she’d forgive him if he didn’t immediately grasp the significance of the results.

“Five to four,” he said. “What’s so special about that?”

“A ratio of small integers isn’t likely to be a coincidence,” Carla replied. “If it was dozens and something to dozens and something else, that would be meaningless, but this suggests very strongly that the numbers in the ratio really are lurking in the physics itself. Four of something, then five of something… the transitions mark a kind of succession.”

Carlo could only understand physics by translating it into geometry; he started raising undulating lines on his chest. “So can I draw it like this, fitting different numbers of cycles into the same amount of time?”

“No, no, no!” Carla chided him. “You’ve got it backward!”

“What’s wrong?” he asked. “Doesn’t that give a five to four frequency ratio?”

“It does,” she conceded. “But I’m working on the assumption that the frequency goes down as the associated integer goes up, and you’ve described the opposite trend. Going your way, there’d be another transition at a higher frequency—‘frequency six’, out in the infrared—beyond which mirrors would start tarnishing at an even greater rate. The trouble with that is, if the pattern in tarnishing rates held up then Marzio’s mirrors would have needed re-polishing after a couple of stints, not a couple of years.”

“All right,” Carlo said. “So how should I picture it?”

“I don’t know yet,” Carla admitted. “All I can say is that light produces a strong tarnishing effect when four times the frequency exceeds a certain number. When the frequency falls so low that you need to multiply it by five to meet the same target, the effect suddenly becomes drastically weaker—and when you need to multiply it by six, it becomes weaker still. It might even vanish entirely at that point; I’d need to do a much longer exposure to be sure.”

Carlo pondered this. “Wouldn’t it be easier to follow the pattern in the other direction? If the effect grows weaker as the magic number goes from four to five to six… what about three? Shouldn’t you get super-fast tarnishing from waves where you can reach the target merely by tripling the frequency?”

“There are no such waves,” Carla replied. “The target is more than three times the maximum frequency of light, so you can never reach it by tripling.”

“Aha.” Carlo had a glimmer of comprehension. “Which is a good thing for mirrorstone, isn’t it? If it was that easy to damage, it probably wouldn’t be around at all.”

“Exactly!” Carla’s eyes widened with pleasure. “Whatever’s going on here, it’s showing us the border of stability. And maybe every mineral, every solid, has its own ‘target number’ like this—but in the case of something like hardstone, it could be so high that even six times the maximum frequency of light doesn’t reach it.”

Carlo said, “The empirical rule sounds simple enough. I suppose the hard part will be making it mesh with the theory—with Nereo’s equation and the luxagen model?”

“Yes.”

“And…?” he prompted her.

“And right now,” she admitted, “I have no idea how to do that.”

Carlo told her about his meeting with Tosco. He’d given her no warning of his plan to return to the animal physiology group—and he offered no justification now, but he watched her face as he spoke. Carla listened politely, in silence, but she almost flinched when he reached the point of describing his new research program. And this was from the subject in its most abstract, impersonal form: comparing biparous and quadraparous fission, hunting for the mechanism that allowed some species to switch between the two.

He understood why it was painful for her to hear. Behind these calm career announcements he was whispering a promise that he had no right to make: I’ll find a way out of the famine—if not for you, for our daughter. He had no right, because people had tried and failed before: countless women driven by hunger, countless men driven by the suffering they’d seen. There was a terrible equilibrium now, and an unspoken consensus that the only real option was to cling to their hard-won resilience and endure what had to be endured.

Carlo couldn’t live like that any more, but he understood that he had to follow this new path quietly, making it as easy as possible for everyone around him to avert their gaze. When he’d said all he needed to say for the sake of honesty, he steered the conversation back to the mysteries of light and matter. Failure there might leave them stranded, doom their whole mission and kill off all their ancestors—but at least they hadn’t been cursed with some wretched half-solution that sapped their resolve and kept them from reaching the real thing.