Wednesday's Child

Afterword

“Child’s Play” was written in 1946, and for a long time was almost too popular. In the Sam and Bella Spewack play Boy Meets Girl, there’s a movie producer who keeps asking a songwriter to write him another “Night and Day.” The writer comes up with song after song, and of each one the producer says, “It’s good, but it’s not another ‘Night and Day’ ” Finally, the songwriter plays a song that knocks the producer out. “What do you call that one?” he asks excitedly. “Night and Day,” says the songwriter.

That’s how I came to feel about “Child’s Play”: for years after I wrote it, editors would look at any new story by me and say, “It’s good, but you know, it’s not another ‘Child’s Play.’ ” At last, in desperation, I sat down to write another “Child’s Play.” I called it “Wednesday’s Child.”

All right. That’s not quite true. At least it’s not the whole truth.

First, Sturgeon warned me not to write a sequel. Especially not a sequel to “Child’s Play.” He felt that one of the worst stories he had ever written was “Butyl and the Breather,” a sequel to his first science-fiction story, “Ether Breather,” and something John Campbell of Astounding had urged him to do. “Sequels,” Ted said, “are pulling on an emptied teat.”

But, I told him, I didn’t want to write a sequel; I just wanted to pick up a provocative little character from “Child’s Play” and examine what could have happened to her.

Ted shook his head ominously. “It’s a sequel,” he said. “And there’ll be no real milk there.”

That’s first. Then, second, I had long been fascinated by Bartolomeo Vanzetti’s last speech to the court that sentenced him to be executed. He spoke of a future in which our time would be “but a dim rememoring [sic] of a cursed past in which man was wolf to the man.”

I wanted to examine—in a story—such a wolf, particularly something I had seen much of, a man who was wolf to a woman.

Then there’s third. I have always had an almost irrational hatred of people in Personnel. I will not go into the whys of it here. I’m not sure the reasons are at all valid. But I do hate them.

And there’s a fourth and possibly a fifth. But I finally wrote the story. And it was bounced. My God, how it was bounced!

John Campbell, who had been begging me for something for Astounding, handed it back with the comment, “I don’t think I’ve ever disliked—plain disliked—a story more than this one.”

Horace Gold of Galaxy, for whom I’d been doing most of my work recently, said with a grimace, “No, Phil, not at all. You’ve finally achieved it: Not just downbeat, but downbeat squared.”

And the next editor sent it back with a note that simply said, “Ptooey.” I had never gotten a rejection note like that before. I thought to myself: “I’m on to something really big here!”

It was finally purchased by Leo Margulies for Fantastic Universe at one-half cent a word, payable on publication. His editor, Frank Belknap Long, told me he felt the purchase was a mistake. “But Leo wanted your name in the book,” he said.

And that might be all that could be said of a story of which I am quite fond, but for one more thing.

A boyish-looking fellow came up to me at a party, someone I had never seen before. “Hey, Phil,” he said, “I understand you’ve just sold a piece to Fantastic Universe.”

“I have,” I told him, “but I’ve not yet been paid for it.”

“That’s neither here nor there,” he said. “The point is, I’ve just sold my first professional story to the same magazine. So—let’s fight it out on the pages of Fantastic Universe, and may the best man win.”

“Who the hell are you?” I asked.

“I’m Harlan Ellison,” he said.

Written 1952 / Published 1955